![]() ![]() The emphasis is on providing all the theoretical details in a unified framework, with pointers to new research directions. The methods are illustrated through real data examples, and software is referenced where possible. This book presents an overview of methodology in these related areas, providing a synthesis of research from the last few decades. Statistical methods for sequential hypothesis testing and changepoint detection have applications across many fields, including quality control, biomedical engineering, communication networks, econometrics, image processing, security, etc. Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testing written by Alexander Tartakovsky and has been published by CRC Press this book supported file pdf, txt, epub, kindle and other format this book has been release on with Mathematics categories. Instant access to millions of titles from Our Library and it’s FREE to try! All books are in clear copy here, and all files are secure so don't worry about it. Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testingĭownload Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testing PDF/ePub, Mobi eBooks by Click Download or Read Online button. If the content Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testing not Found or Blank, you must refresh this page manually. This site is like a library, Use search box in the widget to get ebook that you want. Click Download or Read Online button to get Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testing book now. In contrast to that, there was no performance issue on several AMD EPYC and Opteron systems, and also no issues on Intel i5 and i7 mobile processors.Home › eBooks Download › sequential change detection and hypothesis testing Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testingĭownload Sequential Change Detection And Hypothesis Testing PDF/ePub or read online books in Mobi eBooks. In previous tests I also observed this strange performance issue on Xeon E5-2640 and E5-2640v4 systems. However, on the Xeon E5-2690v4 and E5-4620v4 systems using the single loop is incredibly slow. The AMC EPYC 7452 performed best by far, with almost no difference between the single and dual loop implementation. This also holds for the Xeon E3-1271v3, which is basically the same hardware as an i7-4790. Using the single loop is only slightly slower than the dual loops. On the various i7 models, the results are mostly as expected. The interesting stuff is in the file runner.cpp. Then, the same binary was used on all systems, using numactl -m 0 -N 0 on systems with multiple NUMA domains. For the purpose of testing, the code was compiled using GCC 7.5.0 with flags -O3 -funroll-loops -march=native on a system with a Xeon E5-4620v4. ![]() However, it appears that some Xeon processors are incredibly slow when executing the single loop version.īelow you can see the wall time in nano-seconds divided by n when running the snippet on a range of different processors. dual loop) to perform almost identically on relatively modern hardware. I would have expected the two versions (single vs. We may also split the code into two separate loops: for (int i = 0 i < n ++i) The second line computes the inverse of array_b (many cache misses expected since array_b is a random permutation). The first line of the loop sequentially copies array_a into array_b (very few cache misses expected). array_b and inverse are initialized arrays ![]() I stumbled upon a peculiar performance issue when running the following c++ code on some Intel Xeon processors: // array_a contains permutation of ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |